APPENDIX C – SUMMARY OF CONSULTATION RESPONSES RECEIVED
* Denotes a change from the initial recommendations
Consultation Responses & Representations Received to Initial Proposals |
|||||||
No |
Constituency |
Division |
Polling Districts affected |
Commentator |
Summary of comment |
Assessment of comments |
(Acting) Returning Officer’s final recommendation |
1 |
Richmond and Northallerton* |
North Richmondshire |
Dalton-on-Tees & Eryholme |
Clerk to Dalton-on-Tees Parish Council |
Objection to changing the polling station from Dalton-on-Tees Village Hall to Croft-on-Tees Village Hall. |
Dalton-on-Tees Village Hall condition is poor and currently is not suitable to be used as a polling station. If it is renovated, an inspection and review would take place. |
An interim inspection has taken place to Dalton-on-Tees Village Hall as renovation work is underway and to be completed around mid-December. The final recommendation is to reinstate the polling station to Dalton-on-Tees Village Hall on the evidence of an improvement to the building. A further inspection will be made in January. |
2 |
Richmond and Northallerton |
Catterick & Brompton-on-Swale |
Easby |
Member of the public |
To consider changing their allocated polling station. |
Property falls under Easby parish of Catterick & Brompton-on-Swale division. Their preferred polling station is currently within Richmond East parish of Richmond division. |
Out of scope. |
3 |
Harrogate and Knaresborough |
Coppice & Duchy |
Killinghall (Oakdale Ward) |
Killinghall Parish Councillor |
New developments in both Harrogate Duchy and Killinghall (Oakdale Ward) have no connection with Harrogate Duchy and location of the polling station. |
NYC currently under a LGBCE review of divisions. Upon conclusion of LGBCE review, it may be necessary to carry out a CGR to look at any changes to parish or polling station boundaries and other anomalies. Review of polling districts and polling stations will take place after CGR until such time.
|
Out of scope. |
Killinghall (Oakdale Ward) parish boundary runs through the middle of 15 houses in Ribble Head Road, the parish boundary needs to be moved. |
|||||||
A temporary polling station in the Killinghall (Oakdale Ward) is needed to assist with Army College electors and those in Burley bank road for Killinghall (Rural Ward). |
There will be no changes to the current arrangements for voting as no scheduled elections until May 2027 |
||||||
4 |
Harrogate and Knaresborough |
Killinghall, Hampsthwaite & Saltergate |
Killinghall (Rural Ward) |
Killinghall Parish Councillor |
A temporary polling station in the Killinghall (Oakdale Ward) is needed to assist with Army College electors and those in Burley Bank Road for Killinghall (Rural Ward). |
There will be no changes to the current arrangements for voting as no scheduled elections until May 2027 |
Out of scope |
5 |
Scarborough and Whitby |
Newby |
Newlands, St Marks, Lady Edith & Newby |
Clerk to Newby & Scalby Town Council |
Newby & Scalby Town Council have no objections to the proposal. |
Comments noted |
No change to initial recommendation |
6 |
Harrogate and Knaresborough |
High Harrogate & Kingsley |
High Harrogate |
Councillor Chris Aldred, High Harrogate & Kingsley Division |
Arrangements for High Harrogate is satisfactory. |
Comment noted |
No change to initial recommendation
|
7 |
Kingsley 2* |
Current arrangements for Kingsley 2 are not satisfactory as it is difficult to get to the polling station. Potential alternative at Station View Sheltered Housing Scheme Common Room. |
Inspection of Station View Sheltered Housing Scheme Common Room on suitability for use as a polling station to take place. (Verbal feedback to be provided) |
Potentially change from Starbeck Methodist Church to Station View Sheltered housing scheme common room if it is deemed suitable to be used as a polling station. |
|||
8 |
Starbeck & Kingsley |
Proposals for the LBC to have an extra division at the 2027 Election (Town Council & NYC) where Kingsley may become part of an historic Starbeck ward and a separate polling station would be a great idea. |
At the conclusion of the LGBCE review, there will be a full polling district review which may well require further changes to polling stations. Currently this is out of scope for this review. |
Out of scope |
|||
9 |
Scarborough & Whitby |
Whitby Streonshalth |
Whitby Town (South Ward) |
Councillor Neil Swannick, Whitby Streonshalh division |
The Coliseum is a satisfactory location for the majority of the polling districts. |
Comment noted |
No change to initial proposal |
10 |
Whitby Town (North Ward) |
No objection to using Church House as long as there is step-free access. |
Comment noted |
No change to initial recommendation
|